Dans le cadre du développement durable et du plan air énergie climat développé par la communauté d agglomération il est prévu un volet biodiversité dont l'objectif est d'intégrer les préoccupations de préservation de la biodiversité dans le développement de l'agglomération, en cohérence avec le schéma de cohérence territoriale (SCOT) et avec les options du grenelle de l'environnement (trames vertes et bleues, cohérence des continuités écologiques). Ce Plan Biodiversité conduit par Clermont-Communauté est réalisé par L'Institut des Herbiers universitaires de ClermontrFerrand dans le cadre d'une convention de partenariat signée en Juin 2010.

Argyll and Bute : Woodland and Forestry Strategy 2011 showing indicative suitability for woodland and forestry. It identifies the existing resource, the main issues and strategic priorities within Argyll and Bute

The approach employs a detailed desk study using digital data within a geographic information system (GIS) to identify Integrates Habitat Networks (IHNs). The spatial position and extent of functional integrated habitat networks were determined through a landscape ecology model from the BEETLE (Biological and Environmental Evaluation Tools for Landscape Ecology) suite of tools. The BEETLE least-cost focal species approach negates the need to carry out a vast number of individual species analyses. The selection of the habitats to be modelled, and the species used to inform the analysis, were identified through a series of expert stakeholder workshops. The outputs can support the planning process, help prioritise conservation effort, prevent further fragmentation of biodiversity and aid connectivity of semi natural habitats. BEETLE model analysis has been well referenced (Watts et al., 2005) and used in a variety of projects such as developing forest habitat networks across Scotland. The application of IHNs is the first time that the multiple habitat network approach has been used to solicit planning and development programmes in key areas.

Article 17 of the Habitats Directive requires Member States to report every six years about the progress made with the implementation of the Habitats Directive, according to the biogeographical region. Malta has only one biogeographical region, this being a Mediterranean one, as represented in this dataset.

Description - The England Park boundaries are from various sources and the detailed accuracy of the boundaries cannot be guaranteed. The names of the England Parks are taken from information obtained from the FC websites for these countries. Scotland's name are as supplied. Attributes Forest_Par Area Hectares

Boundaries of Local Nature Conservation Sites within North Ayrshire as set out in the Local Development Plan

L’Inventaire forestier national s’est vu confier, par le ministère chargé des forêts, la tâche de définir un nouveau zonage pour la France métropolitaine prenant en compte les facteurs biogéographiques déterminant la production forestière et la répartition des grands types d'habitat forestier. Ceci a abouti après plusieurs années d’études et de concertation à un maillage du territoire en 11+1 Grandes Régions ECOlogiques (GRECO) et 86+5 sylvoécorégions (SER) Cette couche d’information géographique découpe l'ensemble du territoire métropolitain en 86 sylvoécorégions à l’échelle du 1/ 200 000. Les 5 SER relatives aux alluvions récentes font l’objet d’une autre couche d’information géographique. Chaque sylvoécorégion (SER) constitue « la plus vaste zone géographique à l’intérieur de laquelle les facteurs déterminant la production forestière ou la répartition des grands types d'habitat forestier varient de façon homogène entre des valeurs précises, selon une combinaison originale, différente de celles des SER adjacentes. »

baie - sédiments - biomorphosédimentaires - faciès - baie des Veys - France

This dataset combines all available field data for upland habitat impact assessment (HIA) survey work commissioned by SNH between 2004 and 2018 using the methods described in (Macdonald et al 1998). Data collation was carried out by Edward Wilson as part of the review of deer data Project 017079 managed by Jenny Bryce of the Wildlife Management Activity Team. The aim was to bring together all the available into a corporate dataset, standardise and clean the data and make it accessible for internal and external use. It should be used as the primary source of HIA data as it supersedes (through data cleansing) the data held in spreadsheets. Data refer to small-scale field indicators for grazing and trampling impacts by ungulates - most notably deer and sheep. NB not all indicators are appropriate to a given location, and where this is the case, data are referred to as not applicable (NA), adjacent to the relevant indicator. Additional field data include quantitative and trend measures. Attribute data, including Deer Management Unit, Deer Management Group, designated sites, and - where field-based observations are missing - NVC data, have been obtained from available SNH GIS data. Feature(s) of interest data has been determined based on survey Statements of Requirements and site-level designations (NB where both Natura and SSSI designations overlap, the former is prioritised unless otherwise stated in survey objectives), NVC descriptions and SNH specialised knowledge. Some apparent localised location discrepancies (e.g., points lying outside designated boundaries) do occur occasionally with this data, owing to GPS and human error from the time of survey. The method for producing summary grazing and trampling impact classes for each point have been standardised using a median value (or an intermediate class where there are equal numbers) and hence the summary descriptions (L, ML, M, MH, H) presented in this dataset may vary from those in the original surveyors spreadsheets. Indicator attribute names are coded to state the field guide habitat, as prefix (e.g. SG, for smooth grassland indicators); followed by the type of indicator or measure assessed (i.e., ’Q’, ’I’, ’T’ for quantitative, indicator and trend measures, respectively); the number of the measure, in order; and whether the measure is associated with grazing (‘GR’), trampling (‘TR’) or dunging (‘DU’) by ungulates. The order of the specific measures are taken from MacDonald et al. (1998) small-scale indicators for grazing and tramping impacts (only); the ordering of quantitative measures, which came into being after the guide publication, are determined from SNH document ‘DRAFT HIA Indicator tables 2017 v0.1.docx’ (A2479946). Survey data split into 8 separate layers based on the contents of the field forms used for collection: Blanket bog Dwarf shrub and heath Flushes U7 - U13 Snowbeds Scrub Smooth grassland Tall herbs Wind-clipped heath Explanation of attributes can be found in the HIA_attributes spreadsheet. Additional surveys will be added at irrgeular intervals.

One mosaic of 4 map sheets: 1. Carte de la végétation de la Côte d'Ivoire : feuille Nord-Est. Scale of 1:500 000. Date of publication: 1969. 2. Carte de la végétation de la Côte d'Ivoire : feuille Nord-Ouest. Scale of 1:500 000. Date of publication: 1968. 3. Carte de la végétation de la Côte d'Ivoire : feuille Sud-Est. Scale of 1:500 000. Date of publication: 1969. 4. Carte de la végétation de la Côte d'Ivoire : feuille Sud-Ouest. Scale of 1:500 000. Date of publication: 1969.